A strategy advisory for tech companies and the funds that back them

The gap between strategy and work shows up in behaviors well before it shows up in the numbers.

Running a company: start with the briefs. Backing companies: start with the fund page.

Drift accrued, illustrative quarter $0.0M to $0.0M
What leadership decided vs. what got done

Seen at week 3, drift is a correction. Seen in the numbers, it is a quarter. Illustrative, at 500 people and $100,000 loaded cost: run your own numbers →

WHAT
Value-creation thesis and critical moves
We work with you to state how value will be created and the few moves that must carry it.
WHO
People and capabilities
We test whether each move has the ownership, capacity, and capability it requires. See the method →
HOW
Decisions and work
We trace how priorities become decisions, resource choices, projects, and operating results. See the method →
Built inside a software PE firmfrom a standing start
Used in live engagements since 2023configured around each company's critical moves
Growth stage to multi-billion-dollar publicthe range the method has run
01  Thinking

The point of view and the field work behind it

The papers were developed over several years and standardized as one library in July 2026. Each document states the claim, shows the evidence, names its limits, and gives the reader a next move. Where do you want to start?

The library includes six two-page briefs organized by company moment, the Return on Work paper family, fund-side methods, and AI research. Choose the question you are working on →

02  Method

From the value creation thesis to the work

We lock the thesis and the critical moves with the CEO. Then we trace each move through people, decisions, capacity, work, and economics. The result is a verdict on every move: working, stalled, or absent.

Sanitized composite · Day 14 readout

What the work says

The company and figures are invented and blended. The structure and depth match the readout a CEO receives.

Observed drift $670K to $850K per month · directional
WHAT
Value creation thesis

Reach $32M EBITDA without breaking gross retention or gross margin.

4 critical moves
Critical move
Verdict
What the work says
M1Re-rate the core
Yellow
The new offer exists as a price sheet. Renewal work still runs on the old catalog script.
$2.1M renewed on old terms0 of 63 on new paper
M2Standardize enterprise delivery
Red
Bookings are ahead. Custom commitments are consuming the margin and delivery speed the plan requires.
Bookings +23%Margin 54% vs. 71%190 vs. 88 days live
M3Renewal to expansion
Green
The move has an owner, the work is measured, and NRR has risen from 103 to 106. Leadership should leave the motion alone.
NRR 103 to 1062 quarters
M4Enterprise operating cadence
Red
The board sees progress. No team reports work against the move, and the operating numbers require manual reconciliation.
0 teams reporting work3 systems
Underlying constraint Too many decisions sit with the CEO. The capacity is trapped inside functions and legacy work. 3 of 4 moves stall here

Three moves inside 30 days

01Retire Legacy LMS v2Release 18% of product capacity into the re-rate.
02Delegate the deal deskGive the CRO published guardrails for approvals under $75K.
03Name the owner for M4Require common pipeline definitions in 30 days, or defer the move.

Choose the depth the decision requires

The Directional Read tests whether alignment is likely to be the constraint and whether further work would change a decision. The audit follows every critical move through ownership, decisions, capacity, work, and economics.

Five business days

Directional Read

Establish whether alignment is likely to be the constraint, where the evidence is thin, and whether a full audit would change a decision.

ThesisMovesSampleDecision
Output: go or no-go, the likely constraint, confidence, and the exact test to run next.
Two weeks

Strategy Alignment Audit

Trace every critical move through ownership, decisions, capacity, work, and economics, then test the starting beliefs against operating evidence.

ThesisMovesTraceAction
Output: verdict by move, cost of drift, decision and capacity maps, and actions for 30, 90, and 180 days.
What enters the read
01Strategy and economicsBoard materials, ARR bridge, churn, bookings, margin by cohort.
02Work and capacityProject inventory, capacity by move, projects that support none of the critical moves.
03Decisions and exceptionsDecision rights, approvals, timestamps, escalation routes.
04The system in useCEO sessions, executive interviews, and the meetings where leaders review work and make decisions.

Boundaries: the work reads the company against its value creation thesis. Every claim carries a confidence label. If alignment is not the constraint, we say so and stop. When the evidence is too thin for an important decision, the readout says exactly what must be checked next.

Fees: exact in the first call.
Fixed once quoted.

03  About

Founder-led, built on one question

TL Partners is founder-led, with senior operators brought in per engagement, working primarily with PE-backed and late-stage software companies. The firm asks whether the work an organization produces matches the strategy its leaders set. Alyn is the product incubated at TL Partners to run that comparison continuously.

The method ran inside a fund before it was a firm. Founder and Principal Thomas Igeme built the portfolio talent function at Turn/River Capital from a standing start. Before that: Boston Consulting Group; LinkedIn, where he built its first global sales methodology; Trybe.ai, which he co-founded; and ServiceNow, where he led global scaled learning through hypergrowth. He has led TL Partners since 2023. The fund-side method is documented in The Portfolio Talent Operating System.

Stanford University, B.S. Management Science and Engineering. Instructor, Peak Performance Leadership, Stanford Continuing Studies. Founding advisor, PeopleTech Partners. Board member, Envision Education, FACES SF, and the Faith and Justice Network. Host, Venture Visionaries. LinkedIn

Thomas Igeme
Thomas Igeme · Founder
04  Contact

25 minutes is the right amount of time

If the thinking here sounds like a moment your company is in, that is enough time to find out. Nothing to prep. And if you back companies rather than run one: start with the fund page, then bring us to a partner meeting.